פרסומים אחרונים במדור "חדשות"

In an interview on NBC's "Meet the Press," about one year before the Sept. 11 attacks, Cheney defended the decision of George H.W. Bush's administration not to attack Baghdad because, he said, the United States should not act as though "we were an imperialist power, willy-nilly moving into capitals in that part of the world, taking down governments." In the current environment, he said, "we want to maintain our current posture vis-à-vis Iraq."

Bush, during the campaign, focused more on the dangers of nuclear proliferation than on the removal of Saddam Hussein. In a December 1999 debate among GOP presidential contenders, Bush backtracked when he said he'd "take 'em out" if Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. Asked by the moderator whether he had said "take him out," Bush replied, "Take out the weapons of mass destruction."

Dubi, I think you are comletely misreading this. I think they used "mother and father" as a metaphore for having to choose between two things that are equally important.
Both the army and the "hityashvut" cannot exist without a state. in fact they are both just means to that end. The dillema that they are facing is directly related to the state - they are (or were) being asked to decide which of these is more important to the state.

So, what you're saying is that it is ok for me to think differently as long as i admit that i'm wrong? ever thought about the possibility that your ideas are dangerous to our future?

Well, that's not how I understood the sentence I have quoted but maybe it's just me. In any case that was not my main point, care to comment on the other things I have said?