בתשובה לאייל מולד(ר), 16/05/04 18:13
מיהו הטרוריסט? 223777
I am almost feels as an intruder here but am like to correct some important assumption that may pinpoint to the definition “Terror” and who is terrorist? No, not the dictionary definition, the Middle Eastern real life definition.

I am talking about Mr. Easy and Mr. Rudy Vagner….You guys are arguing about the Egg and the Chicken and by that it is easy on you to portray the IDF as Terrorist as much as the Palestinians.

Fundamentally it is a mistake because you can not differentiate between the camps and their deeds by flatly pointing at the action and reaction activity.

Let’s try it differently for a change….

Let’s assume that the terror acts of the Palestinians stopped tomorrow (by some divine force – so to speak!) What will happen to your opinion?

Let me tell you what will happen….Nothing, Nada, the big silence, suddenly no “Terror” acts from the Israeli side will be commenced, no poor children get killed, no civilian population got hurt, right?

Is that too much to ask? Not at all, it already happened….Oslo, Camp David, Sharm a Sheh, Taba, and…. And… AND…. So that is showing clearly who the terrorist is and who the reactor to the terror acts is.

As well let’s assume that we will isolate the international law that explicitly allows the killing of civilians (though extremely unhappy with that) if fighting forces do hide among them – forget about the law!

The truth is that the Palestinians are behaving like they are not so keen about cutting any peace agreement with Israel. If they do they could have it a long time ago.

Like in many other cases we should follow the money. The Palestinian leadership as well as the Terror organizations is sure to loose a lot, money, power, influence – that is leading to more money, power and influence if the worst will happen and a peace agreement will be cut off between Israel and the Palestinians.

Consider that:

1. The existing situation is sure to help the Palestinians (as said above leadership and terror organizations) to portrays themselves as the eternal victims and that in return causing a contributions activity by all the world nice souls (and not so nice either) of tens of Billions of dollars in the recent years

2. A peace agreement will be resulting in a Palestinian country with all that associated with, such as…responsibility for own destiny. As it seems the Palestinian Leadership and the terror organizations are profiting much from the existing chaos and that is allow them to brush out any self, national responsibility by moving it onto the international community shoulders.

3. The existing situation is allowing the Palestinians to portray the Israelis as the wicked side, the strong and mighty one that is unfairly stepping devilishly on the victim, weak side. Cutting a peace agreement and creating own country will convert the dispute between the “Poor” and the “Occupier” to a legitimate fight between two countries and they are estimating for themselves a total defeat.

4. The Palestinians are not hiding their final goal and that is the destruction of Israel as a Jewish democratic country and establish instead a Palestinian majority country (theocratic or not is not important here right now). Until then the fogy situation is serving the Palestinian side better then it is serving the Israeli side and the Palestinians leadership is well aware of the situation.

5. Israel and the Palestinians, both were granted tens of billions of dollars from external supporting sources in the past 20 years and more. Though I am not claiming that some Israelis are clean of corruption, see where we are and where they are…any more words here are useless.

Claiming that the Israeli IDF activity is equal to the Palestinian terror is making unjust to history and factual evens in the Middle East.
Nothing here was starting in a vacuum. History was not started three years ago, the conflicts here is topping one hundred years already and going. Taking the event out of the historic event surroundings and context is less then clever.

Having said all the above, I do believe that there are some parts in the Palestinian population (my personal estimation – about 1/3 of the population) that do want sincerely cutting a peace agreement with us. Unfortunately their political weight and influence has not come yet to the required critical mass (should be around 60-70% - again my personal estimation only).

It is a sure thing that the Palestinians are shooting themselves in the leg. The ruling of Arafat and his gangs is preserving their situation and there is no doubt that if they were deploying a democratic system then we could have the chance for a peace agreement between us a long time ago.
The question that remains is: “Are we to suffer and carry their incompetence?”
This is not a Kindergarten and we are not the companionate care givers of the Middle East.
This is the reason that we have to depart from the Palestinians, finish the Separation Fence as soon as possible (in as little as possible trouble for both sides), this Fence is the symbol of our desire to live away from there inability to take care of themselves seriously, and let them boiling in their own juices – letting them for the first time to be responsible for their own destiny, no excuses.

I see a lot of sense with those claiming that no peace agreement (a real one) is possible in our times; the “Desert Generation” (Israeli and Palestinian) should go and younger more pragmatic, much less emotional generation should rise up and cut a peace agreement.

When? Well, “Since the destruction of our temple the prophecy was given to the fools only….”


חזרה לעמוד הראשי

מערכת האייל הקורא אינה אחראית לתוכן תגובות שנכתבו בידי קוראים