'No forbearance of failure by the Employer at any time to require performance of any provision of the Agreement or to enforce strictly the obligations of the Employee or to take action to suspend the Employee or to determine the Agreement forthwith upon discovering cause therefor shall effect the right of the Employer so to do any time and no waiver by the Employer of any condition or breach of any clause whether by conduct or otherwise shall constitute a continuing or further waiver of any such condition or breach or as the breach of any other clause.'

No forbearance of failure by the Employer at any time to
{
--------- require performance of any provision of the Agreement
--------- or
--------- to enforce strictly the obligations of the Employee
--------- or
--------- to take action to suspend the Employee
--------- or
--------- to determine the Agreement forthwith upon discovering cause
}
therefor shall effect
{
--------- the right of the Employer so to do any time
}
and
no waiver by the Employer of
{
--------- any condition
--------- or
--------- breach of any clause
}
whether
{
--------- by conduct
--------- or
--------- otherwise
}
shall constitute
{
--------- a continuing
--------- or
--------- further waiver
}
of
{
--------- any such condition
--------- or
--------- breach
--------- or
--------- as the breach of any other clause.

STAY TUNED

The interesting aspect of many patterns is their dynamic behavior. We can certainly show this with interaction diagrams, but only in the context of a specific model; it is harder to keep the "patternness" of the patterns open. Finally patterns are templates, in a sense, in which classes, associations, attributes and operations might all be mapped into different names which [I wonder if this should be "while"?] keeping the essence of the pattern; we need a way to clearly parameterize the patterns. Nevertheless we feel that we have enough facilities to capture patterns within the UML by expressing them in terms of interactions.”