I want to remark from a different point of view.

Sexual harassment is less of a problem in
less-macho countries (e.g., Scandinavia - correct
me if I'm wrong about that). The reason is, perhaps,
that men there learn to control their sexual instincts.
They are "colder". There is no way to have "hot"
men and no sexual harassment, because if men are
allowed to be "hot", some of them (say, the
hottest 10%) will be boiling with hormones and
unable to control themselves properly.
This means that women should be prepared, in
return for safer interaction with men, to have "colder"
sex and a generally colder, inhibited atmosphere.
What does it mean? It means, for a woman, that
whether you come to work with your sexiest skirt
and a show-it-all shirt, or else with a square and
show-nothing suit, there will be almost no difference
in the amount of sexual attention you will get. Men
will simply not get so excited by your clothing.
It's simple. It's also safe.

From a practical point of view, I think the way this
behavior is achieved it is very simple: When men get
used to seeing naked women very often (e.g., in the
sauna, or sunbathing naked in the park, etc.) they may
become less excited by the view. It just isn't such a big
deal for them anymore. It is like a vaccination - expose
men to a lot of female nudity under controlled
circumstances, and they will stop being so aroused by it.

I wonder if this is what we want - but this is probably the
way we're going anyway.

L.G.